<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACM censors linking!</title>
	<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101</link>
	<description>Coding wisdom and rants of Christer Ericson</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Association for Computing Machinery tries to undermine open access &#124; dv8-designs</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3093</link>
		<author>Association for Computing Machinery tries to undermine open access &#124; dv8-designs</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>[...] to copyright (the ACM exists to support the computing community, not to make money, and they seem to have forgotten that). I&#8217;ve just written a blog post about their latest bit of asshattery - they are trying to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to copyright (the ACM exists to support the computing community, not to make money, and they seem to have forgotten that). I&#8217;ve just written a blog post about their latest bit of asshattery - they are trying to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realtimecollisiondetection.net - the blog &#187; ACM commits more evil - please act!</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3092</link>
		<author>realtimecollisiondetection.net - the blog &#187; ACM commits more evil - please act!</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>[...] previous episode of the ACM saga had a powerful organization bully a young impressionable PhD student into deleting his fully legal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] previous episode of the ACM saga had a powerful organization bully a young impressionable PhD student into deleting his fully legal [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real-Time Rendering &#183; Ke-Sen Huang&#8217;s paper pages are down, will soon go back up</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3065</link>
		<author>Real-Time Rendering &#183; Ke-Sen Huang&#8217;s paper pages are down, will soon go back up</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3065</guid>
		<description>[...] resulted in an outpouring of anger as well as support for Ke-Sen.  Many people in the community contacted the ACM Publications Board [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] resulted in an outpouring of anger as well as support for Ke-Sen.  Many people in the community contacted the ACM Publications Board [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erwincoumans</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3061</link>
		<author>erwincoumans</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>Bummer. Long live the Wayback machine:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2007.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2006.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2005.html
etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer. Long live the Wayback machine:</p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2007.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2007.html</a><br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2006.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2006.html</a><br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2005.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20070815140509/kesen.huang.googlepages.com/sig2005.html</a><br />
etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Since the ACM envies the bad press the IEEE gets&#8230; &#171; visualization, etc.</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3060</link>
		<author>Since the ACM envies the bad press the IEEE gets&#8230; &#171; visualization, etc.</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3060</guid>
		<description>[...] and it now seems that ACM is trying to steal some of that spotlight. The ACM publications board has decided to shut down some of the most useful resources available on the web for indexing recent conference papers, such [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and it now seems that ACM is trying to steal some of that spotlight. The ACM publications board has decided to shut down some of the most useful resources available on the web for indexing recent conference papers, such [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenpex</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3059</link>
		<author>kenpex</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3059</guid>
		<description>This is the answer I got. I do actually understand their reasons, in a way they have always been very liberal, but I do think they don't understand who they should be making money with. It's not that my company, my university etc are going to not subscribe to ACM and buy siggraph DVDs because of the work of Ke-Sen Huang...

---

[Christer: Sorry kenpex, I'm not interested in having Holly Rushmeier's bullshit statement posted on my blog. Her statement is morally corrupt, legally suspect, and totally ignorant of the realities of the flow of information on the internet today. It has been removed.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the answer I got. I do actually understand their reasons, in a way they have always been very liberal, but I do think they don&#8217;t understand who they should be making money with. It&#8217;s not that my company, my university etc are going to not subscribe to ACM and buy siggraph DVDs because of the work of Ke-Sen Huang&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>[Christer: Sorry kenpex, I&#8217;m not interested in having Holly Rushmeier&#8217;s bullshit statement posted on my blog. Her statement is morally corrupt, legally suspect, and totally ignorant of the realities of the flow of information on the internet today. It has been removed.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3058</link>
		<author>Kenneth</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing attention to this Christer!

My impression is that SIGGRAPH management is taking SIGGRAPH in a direction where none of the members want to go. It is also a direction opposite of the rest of science and academia - and common sense. What is the motivation?!

Will they require a closing down of the "Physics in Graphics" pages too? Papers referred to there are mainly published by the ACM too.
http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~clavetsi/physicsingraphics-details.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing attention to this Christer!</p>
<p>My impression is that SIGGRAPH management is taking SIGGRAPH in a direction where none of the members want to go. It is also a direction opposite of the rest of science and academia - and common sense. What is the motivation?!</p>
<p>Will they require a closing down of the &#8220;Physics in Graphics&#8221; pages too? Papers referred to there are mainly published by the ACM too.<br />
<a href="http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~clavetsi/physicsingraphics-details.html" rel="nofollow">http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~clavetsi/physicsingraphics-details.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonwriter</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3056</link>
		<author>anonwriter</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>The ACM attempted (attempted meaning I didn't put up with their shit) to charge me money to view/review the copy of my published (ACM) conference paper that they hosted. They're awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACM attempted (attempted meaning I didn&#8217;t put up with their shit) to charge me money to view/review the copy of my published (ACM) conference paper that they hosted. They&#8217;re awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3054</link>
		<author>uberVU - social comments</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realtimecollisiondetection.net/blog/?p=101#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChristerEricson: Fuck you ACM! http://bit.ly/5w0rAf...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChristerEricson: Fuck you ACM! <a href="http://bit.ly/5w0rAf..." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5w0rAf&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
